You are currently viewing Same Quality at Half the Size: How Good Is Canon’s New Compressed Raw Format?

Same Quality at Half the Size: How Good Is Canon’s New Compressed Raw Format?

[ad_1]

Same Quality at Half the Size: How Good Is Canon’s New Compressed Raw Format?

The majority of photographers shoot raw files because the larger file sizes over JPEG are offset by the big gains in post-processing flexibility. Nonetheless, companies are always doing what they can to give photographers options for smaller file sizes with minimal quality loss, with the latest from Canon being the Compressed Raw format on their new mirrorless cameras. This great video takes a look at how these files hold up against traditional raw files and if you should switch the feature on.

Coming to you from Alex Barrera, this excellent video takes a look at Canon’s new Compressed Raw format. If you have shot with the EOS R or EOS RP cameras, you may have noticed that they use a new file format (CR3) and that you have the option of saving files in Compressed Raw. This format will generally save about 40-50% in file size, which offers a substantial gain in storage and can make life a lot easier if you frequently come home with large batches of images. Not only will this make things like storage and backup easier, but it will also give you gains in buffer usage when shooting. On the other hand, the disadvantage of compression is that it can often result in image quality loss, but you might be surprised by just how good Canon’s version is — so much so that you might just prefer to leave the option turned on at all times unless you are really performing extreme edits. Check out the video above for Barrera’s full thoughts.

Video of Should you use Canon cRaw? – Raw Files Compared

[ad_2]

Source link

Leave a Reply